Soon I will explain better these differences between ancient (direct) democracy and modern (representative) democracy, which are the very essence of India Phone Number List classical liberalism and which allow me to reformulate the idea of a crisis of representation. But what interests me the most about this reinterpretation of the idea of crisis of representation, no longer anecdotal, but essential, is that it can help us better India Phone Number List understand the historical meaning of the advent of digital mass public conversation. and to glimpse the deep meaning of the fact that we perceive it as barbaric or as a threat against democracy.
My hypothesis is that if we understand well India Phone Number List what the crisis of representation consists of, as something intrinsic and insurmountable in modern democracy, we will also better understand what is at stake in the mass public conversation that seems to arouse so much concern. My suspicion India Phone Number List is that the crisis of representation required (due to a drive to close a constitutive wound, a false closure, perhaps) the appearance of something similar to that mass public conversation that digital technology made hatch. The beautiful totality in crisis But what does the reformulation of the crisis of representation as the essence of India Phone Number List representative democracy consist of?
What does the distinction between ancient and India Phone Number List modern democracy crystallized in classical liberal political theory have to do with it? A brief and superficial historical review of the way in which the device of representative democracy was conceived in the liberal tradition can be useful when answering these questions. As its most lucid critics (Carl Schmitt among them) correctly pointed out, liberalism is a political ideology that is against it, reactive; It is not born from a positive proposal for the foundation of society, but from the India Phone Number List contrast with inherited powers and the attempt to qualify or corrode them, always with the protection of individual freedom as a goal.